August 2003
Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Editorial
A Case Not Made
|
|
Wisconsin Favorites
Wilhelm Tell Festival: A Celebration
of Freedom
|
|
ARCHIVES |
|
It’s Elementary!
Always Present, Sometimes Feared, Electricity
is Part of Nature
Like many of our basic needs,
electricity has become so commonplace that we rarely stop to
consider exactly what it is, how it comes into being, how it
behaves, how much we use, and what we need to do to assure we
have it available to use.
This article and a companion in next month’s
Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News will address these issues.
Our goal is for co-op members of all ages to gain a clearer
understanding of this phenomenon we call electricity. We will
explore how and why electricity comes about, how it behaves,
and how it is used.
What is it?
Physicists believe there are four
basic forces of nature: gravity, the strong nuclear force, the
weak nuclear force, and electromagnetism. What we commonly call
electricity is just one form of the electromagnetic force. Examples
of other forms include microwaves, radio and television waves,
and magnetic fields.
Electricity is the transfer of energy between
subatomic particles with opposite charges. When an electron
that has a charge of –1 interacts with a particle with
an opposite charge, energy from that electron is transferred
in the direction of the particle with the opposite charge. The
flow of energy between these very small particles is called
an electric current. It is measured in amperes (or amps; see
textbox).
Diversity and Electricity
No two people are the same. Our
environment is made up of things that are quite different from
one another. A plane flying through the air is very different
from the air surrounding it. A building is made of different
materials than the office workers and equipment inside it.
The fact that there are differences between
objects all over the earth holds true for the entire universe.
There are 92 natural elements that comprise
the building blocks of which all material objects are made,
and all differ from each other. These differences, even though
they may be small, are enough to create a difference in electrical
potential between them, meaning a current can flow between them.
The cover of this magazine shows a youngster
attempting to verify this. She has taken wires of two dissimilar
metals—copper and aluminum—and inserted them into
a (Wisconsin-grown) potato. Using a voltmeter, she is measuring
an extremely small electric current. Electric potential (also
called voltage and measured in volts) is the force that can
cause electrons to move. If there is a complete circuit, the
voltage created in this young girl’s potato can make the
electrons in the wire bump from one atom to the next. This can
be measured as the very small current that flows between the
two wires in the potato.
The demonstration is important because it
indicates to us that we can find electric current in nature,
and this current is not generated by a power plant, a wind turbine,
or a portable generator. The young woman has not really created
electricity; she has discovered it and measured it.
Her experiment demonstrates that we can find
electricity in unexpected places.
The fact is that electricity, usually in extremely small amounts,
is everywhere.
Because of the differences between materials in objects, differences
in electrical potential exist everywhere throughout the universe.
They existed before human beings and animals appeared on the
earth. They have always existed. On the other hand, if everything
in the universe was made up of exactly the same material, electricity
could not exist.
How do we make electricity?
Electricity exists in nature because
of differences between the atoms that make up various things.
But electricity can also be generated by machines built by people.
Rotating a magnet on a shaft inside a huge bundle of copper
wire will create electricity. A machine that does this is called
a generator. Generators are powered by many forms of energy—coal,
nuclear fuel, flowing water, wind, diesel fuel, etc.—but
they all operate on the same principle: rotating a magnet a
high speeds within a densely-packed winding of copper wires.
When this happens, electrons are excited to higher energy states,
enabling them to move from one atom in a wire to the next, and
in the process, to transfer large amounts of energy into a conductor
such as a transmission line, then a distribution line, and ultimately
to a place where the energy does useful work.
Lazy Electricity and Grounding
Electricity does not behave in
a random manner, but according to predictable patterns determined
by the laws of physics. One of the most important and commonly
known behaviors of electricity is that it takes the path of
least resistance. Resistance is the characteristic of a material
that enables it to slow down or obstruct the flow of electrical
energy through it or across its surface. We’re all familiar
with common items like rubber and glass, which are poor conductors
of electricity because they have such high resistance.
Like fluids, electricity prefers to move
along a path with the fewest obstructions. So electricity will
“go out of its way” if it encounters resistance
in the form of insulators or other non-conductive or poorly
conductive materials and has other paths it can follow. Also
like fluids, electricity will follow all paths available to
it in proportion to the ease with which it can flow on each
one. In electricity these are called “parallel paths.”
Because electricity takes the path of least
resistance and because people can become that path, grounding
is vitally important.
Grounding offers a safe, reliable pathway
for electricity to reach the ground and eventually get back
to its source without causing harm. The less grounding we have,
the more we increase the potential for electricity to flow on
pathways where it can cause harm. Because human beings are made
up of a good deal of water (in which salt and other minerals
are dissolved) we are, unfortunately, pretty good conductors
of electricity.
Properly grounded electrical circuits ensure
that the ground wire itself—not a human being or animal—will
provide a safe, short pathway for electricity in the event of
a fault or failure in an electrical circuit.
But why does electricity seek to flow to
the earth, anyway?
What electricity really seeks is a path back
to its source. Remember our young scientist and her potato.
Without a piece of metal inserted in the potato and connected
by wire to a dissimilar piece of metal also inserted in the
potato, she wouldn’t have a very successful experiment.
Only because she completes a circuit can she measure a flow
of electrons. If she broke the connecting wire and inserted
both ends in the earth, she’d be able to measure a small
flow of electrons moving through the earth to complete the circuit.
This would probably be a lesser current than he measured with
the wire intact, because the resistance of the earth is usually
greater than that of a wire.
Electrical Myths
Most of the time, electricity
is invisible. Except for controlled experiments, demonstrations
by professionals, and in science classes, you can’t usually
see electricity. Outside these settings, visible electricity
(lightning or an arc resulting from a short circuit or electrical
fault) is generally a sign of danger.
Electricity’s invisibility helps give
rise to myths and distortions of science relating to the nature
of electricity and other forms of electromagnetic energy. We
don’t always trust or feel comfortable with things we
can’t see.
Take radio waves for example. Some people
believe radio waves make them sick, and they pay consultants
large sums of money to sell them devices to “filter out”
radio waves.
But there is no credible medical evidence that ordinary, day-to-day
exposure to radio waves is harmful to human or animal health.
We are all exposed to radio waves, static
electricity, and small amounts of electric current all the time.
We would be exposed to these things even if there were no radio
and television stations, no power plants, and no electric transmission
and distribution wires. As noted at the beginning of this article,
electricity is a basic force of nature. Like the basic forces
of nature it is invisible, yet its effects are not. Like the
other forces of nature, it exists in the environment and would
do so with or without human or animal presence on the earth.
There are other myths similar to the “radio
wave sickness” myth. One of these is that extremely small
amounts of current in the earth—including naturally occurring
electricity in the ground—causes humans and animals to
sicken and die. Such notions should be evaluated on the basis
of reason and common sense, not on emotion and fear. The predominant
method of distributing electricity in the world today is based
on a distribution system with a well-grounded neutral wire.
Because of the laws of physics, this system will have some amount
of current traveling in paths through the earth in parallel
with the utility’s neutral system. This system has been
used for more than a century because no other method of distributing
electricity is safer.
In our next issue…
The citizens of Wisconsin use
65 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity per year. Usage of
electric power will continue to rise in the future. Next month,
we’ll look at how we can supply our state’s growing
demand for electricity.—David Jenkins and Chuck Spargo,
P.E.
Electrical Terms
Ampere—a measure of
electrical current. One ampere is 6,250,000,000,000,000,000
electrons passing a point in one second.
Conductor—commonly a
wire, but any material that will carry electrical current.
Current—the movement
of electrons through a conductor.
Ohm—a measure of electrical
resistance, defined as the resistance of a circuit with a voltage
of one volt and a current flow of one ampere.
Resistance—the relative
ease or difficulty with which a given material will allow an
electrical current to pass through it.
Volt—a unit of electromotive
force or electrical “pressure.” An electrical potential
of one volt will cause one ampere of current to flow through
a conductor with one Ohm’s resistance.
Watt—a measure of electrical
power or electrical power consumption, equal to 1/746 horsepower.
The power used in a circuit with a potential difference (or
“drop”) of one volt and a current of one ampere
(amp).
|
TOP
Watts from Waste
Landfill Gas to Enhance Power Supply
Methane gas harvested from a
landfill will be turned into at least three megawatts of electricity
beginning this fall, the product of a partnership between Dairyland
Power Cooperative and ONYX Waste Services brought together by
Eau Claire Energy Cooperative.
Announced in mid-June, the project will initially
generate enough power to run about 2,600 homes and has the potential
to expand to five megawatts.
The source of the energy will be the Seven
Mile Creek Landfill at Eau Claire, owned by ONYX, which is an
Eau Claire Energy Co-op member and one of the largest solid
waste management organizations in North America. The landfill
is a regional collector of residential waste, and it already
has a system in place to capture the methane gas that is produced
by the natural decomposition of landfill waste.
Dairyland will purchase the methane under
contract with ONYX and will install and own the methane-fired
generating equipment that will produce the electricity for residential
and business consumers in the cooperative system.
Harnessing the Burn
Among the environmental benefits
cited in the project’s announcement was saving the energy
equivalent of almost a quarter-million barrels of oil annually.
Currently, the energy from the methane gas is wasted, as it
must be burned off into the atmosphere. Project coordinators
also say local air quality will benefit from the new system,
as the methane will be harnessed as a “green” energy
source instead of just being burned with no benefit.
Mark Vinall, General Landfill Manager, said,
“Eau Claire Energy deserves a lot of credit for helping
to spearhead this progressive project by bringing Onyx and Dairyland
Power together and making this become a reality.”
Co-op CEO John Luehrsen called the environmental
benefits “fantastic” and said the project will “help
us to be a good neighbor to our community and remain a quality
energy provider. We are delighted that this energy will go into
the community that supports the Seven Mile Landfill.”
Win-Win Proposition
Incorporating the landfill gas-to-energy
program into Dairyland’s power supply helps to expand
the cooperative’s use of renewable forms of electricity
and conserve the use of traditional fuel sources, according
to William Berg, CEO of the La Crosse-based Dairyland Power.
“It is a win-win prospect for all parties involved, especially
the consumers, who will truly benefit from this reliable and
environmentally beneficial energy resource,” said Berg,
commenting that Dairyland is looking at developing additional
renewable energy facilities at other landfills in Wisconsin
and Iowa.
Dairyland Power currently supplies renewable
energy to Eau Claire Energy Co-op and its other member distribution
cooperatives from its Flambeau Hydro Station near Ladysmith
and from a wind farm in southwestern Minnesota. The cooperative
power supplier has also signed a letter of intent to produce
renewable electricity at dairy and swine farms within its 62-county
service area—developments that would use manure digesters
to produce methane gas.
Stabilizing Electric Supply
Bryan Johnson, project development
engineer at ONYX, said that in addition to being renewable,
landfill gas is a reliable energy source, allowing generation
to operate 24 hours per day, seven days a week. “Unlike
the case of some other popular renewable sources, the wind doesn’t
have to blow and the sun doesn’t have to shine for methane
production to continue,” he observed. “Because of
this, from an electrical distribution standpoint, methane facilities
can be a stabilizing force for energy supply.”
The company Johnson works for has considerable
experience with projects of this type. ONYX Waste Services works
with more than 125,000 commercial/industrial firms and one million
residences in 11 states, the Bahamas, and Mexico. The company
operates 49 collection facilities and 26 solid waste sanitary
landfill facilities in the United States.
|
TOP
A Case Not Made
Editorial by Perry Baird
Was the evidence of danger ample
enough and sufficiently reliable to warrant such government
response? What did agency officials know—or not know—before
recommending action?
Although the questions might sound like those
currently being pressed on the Bush administration about the
war in Iraq, we’re actually asking them about a statewide
matter concerning the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
(DNR).
A plan requiring 80-percent cuts in mercury
emissions from Wisconsin power plants won unanimous approval
by the Natural Resources Board in late June—an endorsement
that apparently sprang from thin evidence supporting need and
prospects for accomplishing much.
Cobbled Claims
The DNR’s posture is that
dramatically reducing in-state mercury emissions will shield
the public from health hazards the agency attributes to eating
fish that contain mercury. Frankly, we think there’s been
scant data to support the agency’s assumptions.
"The department has been
extremely careful to minimize any claims about environmental
improvements,” said Dave Hoopman, who for the past two
years has represented Wisconsin’s electric cooperatives
on a citizens’ advisory panel assembled by the DNR. He
said at the very first meeting of the committee in the summer
of 2001, he called for an estimate of the “environmental
and public health effects of complete success” applying
the regulation, but he has never heard a clear response from
the agency.
“I don’t believe any
proponent of this rule has come up with an answer to that question
that would stand five minutes’ scrutiny,” he told
the Natural Resources Board members the day they gave their
nod to the emissions-reduction proposal.
Methodical Sidestepping
Mercury deposition patterns predicted
in at least two different computer models—including one
from an organization to which the DNR Air Bureau itself belongs—say
the rule will have no significant mercury-reduction effect.
According to Hoopman, if all coal-fired power
plants in the state were to be totally shut down, it would reduce
mercury deposition here by less than 5 percent.
“The department has methodically
ignored this data,” Hoopman charged, noting that the DNR
has requested federal funds to create its own computer model
to estimate the rule’s effects. The money was approved
almost two years ago, but the DNR says the model won’t
be ready until 2004.
“Meanwhile, we’re
supposed to implement the regulation without knowing what it
will do,” he continued. “Personally, I think we
do know what it will do, and that’s why the model won’t
exist until after the rule is enacted.”
One thing the rule would unquestionably
do is cost utilities and their consumers. We think government
has a responsibility to refrain from piling financial cost and
other burdens on people unless its regulations can be reasonably
expected to accomplish something useful.
The Legislature is the next step for the rule. We hope lawmakers
agree.
|
TOP
Wilhelm
Tell Festival: A Celebration of Freedom
Plan on spending this year’s
Labor Day weekend in New Glarus, Wisconsin. For the 66th year
in a row, America’s Little Switzerland will be putting
on the Wilhelm Tell Festival. Not only can you experience the
story of Wilhelm Tell reenacted with frisky goats, mooing cows,
and whinnying horses, you’ll have an opportunity to take
part in a parade, an ethnic fashion show, an outdoor art fair,
and much more.
The official start of the festival is the
Laternenzug (lantern parade) at 8 p.m. on Friday. The children
of New Glarus parade through the streets at dusk with candle-lit
lanterns of all shapes and sizes. End the evening listening
to the Swiss music of the New Glarus Kinder Chor.
The highlight of the festival is the Tell
Pageant. The play, written by the German playwright Friedrich
Schiller, tells the story of Wilhelm Tell, who helped Switzerland
achieve independence from Austria in 1291 with an arrow and
apple.
The pageant is set outdoors in a secluded
meadow surrounded by woods. Guests are ushered down a shady
path to rustic bleacher-like structures formed from large flat
rocks (chair seating is also available). Adding to the atmosphere
are authentic Swiss folk dances performed by girls of all ages
prior to the performance and during intermission. The performers,
dressed in traditional costumes, act out a story of patriotic
heroism.
The pageant is presented in English on Saturday,
August 30, and in German on Sunday, August 31. Both performances
begin at 1 p.m. All reserved seats are $8 (purchased in advance).
General admission tickets are sold on the day of the show and
are $5 for students and $8 for adults. Reservations are not
necessary and tickets can be purchased the day of the pageant.
Enjoy an evening of traditional Swiss entertainment at the Alpine
Festival on Saturday night at 8.
On Sunday, festival activities include a book sale,
ethnic fashion show of authentic folk costumes, an art fair,
and the annual street dance in the heart of downtown.
For detailed information on festival activities,
visit www.wilhelmtell.org or call 800/527-6838. To order tickets,
send an email to tickets@wilhelmtell.org or order by mail and
send to Wilhelm Tell Community Guild, PO Box 456, New Glarus,
WI 53574.
|
TOP
|