April
2006 Issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin Favorites
Jurustic Park
|
|
ARCHIVES |
|

Reliable Sources
Wisconsin boosts homegrown electricity
In government, the creation of a committee
to study an issue is often as not its first step toward oblivion.
Six or 12 months later, the committee report is accepted with
flashbulbs popping and handshakes all around—and ceremoniously
placed on a shelf to gather dust.
So it was not without reason that some believed
the report and recommendations of the Governor’s Task
Force on Energy Efficiency and Renewables would meet that fate.
For a while, it looked like they’d made the right call.
Formed in the fall of 2003, the task force
took a bit more than a year to finalize its recommendations
and deliver them to Governor Doyle. But there were clear signs
that stakeholder groups who liked the recommendations would
turn their backs on anything but a unified, indivisible package
including both a stronger renewable energy mandate and a guarantee
that energy conservation funds would no longer be periodically
raided to balance other parts of the state budget.
Success would require assembling a complicated
and not entirely uncontroversial set of proposals that could
be embraced, intact, by diverse groups with equally diverse
agendas. A year after the task force report, there was no legislative
draft and prospects looked dim.
Then last November, a bill draft finally emerged
and the energy committees in both houses promptly held hearings.
After a holiday break and several weeks of drafting revisions,
the two houses approved the bill with a single dissenting vote
and in mid-March the Governor signed it into law.
The Spur
There’s no mystery about what suddenly
got the renewables bill moving, according to State Rep. Phil
Montgomery (R–Green Bay), chairman of the Assembly Committee
on Energy and Utilities.
“It was one, singular moment and that
was when Senator Cowles and I decided to take the whole public
benefits program back to pre-Act 9 and secure the funds,”
Montgomery told Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News.
Act 9 was the 1999 electric reliability legislation
that, among many other things, set up a state-controlled funding
pool to promote energy conservation, financed by a fee added
on to energy consumers’ monthly bills. Previously, utilities
had been responsible for their own energy conservation and efficiency
programs, but as Montgomery explained, “At the time we
passed Act 9 everybody thought we’d be moving into a more
deregulated energy market with lots of out-of-state providers,
and it made sense to centralize public benefits.”
Since that was before Enron imploded, no one
foresaw the non-arrival of electric deregulation in Wisconsin.
Neither did anyone foresee what would happen to the alluring
pool of cash accumulated in the energy conservation program.
Displaying bipartisan cooperation not often
seen during the last two biennial budget cycles, the Democratic
administration and Republican Legislature siphoned $109 million
from public benefits programs to help finance other state spending
priorities, much of it going for state aid to local governments.
When the state program was created, some criticized
electric cooperatives and municipal utilities for declining
to pay into the state funding pool, holding out for local retention
of the fees under “commitment to community” programs.
Now, ironically, public benefits will revert to something more
closely resembling the co-op and muni model, the one method
proven to ensure the money is spent for the intended purposes.
That was crucial to moving the renewables package
through the Assembly. Montgomery explained, “I knew I
couldn’t get the bill through my caucus without it.”
In the Act 9 debate seven years ago, prominent members of the
GOP majority labeled the public benefits program a “hidden
tax” on utility bills. But with the money beyond the reach
of budget-balancing maneuvers, the renewables bill sailed through
the Assembly 94–0.
The Magic Number
Safeguarding public benefits money may have
been the key to enacting the task force recommendations, but
their centerpiece is the mandate to obtain 10 percent of this
state’s overall electricity mix from renewable energy
sources by the end of 2015.
Wisconsin currently gets about 4 percent of
its electricity from renewables. That’s about twice what
existing law required when the task force proposals were developed,
so implementing them will more than double today’s share
of renewables in the energy mix and more than quadruple what
was prescribed by prior law.
Montgomery says that’s a practical target.
Noting that the industry exceeded its requirements under the
old law he told us, “You want to be ambitious and stretch
technologies and the thinking and push people a little bit.”
Another goal, he added, is to protect ratepayers. “We
want to explore this and push as far as possible, but it doesn’t
make sense to have ratepayers face tremendous pressure just
to meet an artificial number.”
His Senate counterpart agrees. Robert Cowles,
chairman of the Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities and Information
Technology, told us the 10-percent goal is “reasonable,
especially since the technology’s gotten better.”
Cowles, like Montgomery a Green Bay Republican,
adds, “If we’d done this five years ago it would
have been pretty problematic, but there’s so much you
can do now because the technology has improved.”
A member of the original task force, a believer
in its recommendations, and arguably their most tireless advocate,
Cowles said on the day the bill passed the Senate that it was
“not some pie-in-the-sky initiative.”
“This is about massive capital investment
in Wisconsin,” he said.
Something Old, Something New
Along with new energy sources, the law promotes
older ones previously unrecognized as renewables.
Hydroelectric plants of less than 60 megawatts
were renewable resources under prior law. But a plant in service
before 1998 could count for no more than 0.6 percent of the
owner’s required share of renewables. The new law eliminates
that restriction.
Another super-efficient technology previously
shunned was geothermal space- and water-heating systems.
Beginning in 2002, Vernon Electric Cooperative
and the Wisconsin Electric Cooperative Association waged a two-year
fight for Department of Administration (DOA) consent to make
the La Farge headquarters of the Kickapoo Valley Reserve the
first state facility ever built with a ground-source heat pump
(see July 2002 editorial archived on www.wecnagazine.com). Under
the new law, in planning space- or water-heating for new or
existing state buildings, the DOA must see that geothermal technologies
are used to the greatest extent that’s cost effective
and technically feasible.
Anaerobic digesters—converting livestock
manure into clean-burning methane to fuel electric generation—are
just beginning to appear in Wisconsin’s energy portfolio.
Under the new law, the Department of Agriculture, Trade and
Consumer Protection’s next budget request must include
funds for research on anaerobic digester development.
After months of work “so demanding it
just blotted out the sun,” Cowles is optimistic.
“It sends the state in a direction that
will help ratepayers and the agricultural community,”
he said. “With methane from manure digesters and wind
power, it will bring some needed cash into the agricultural
area of the economy.”
And decrease, if only by a little, the share
of electricity we have to buy someplace else.—Dave Hoopman
|
TOP
School for Scandal
Whistleblower Recounts Enron Collapse
After stumbling across accounting irregularities
involving hundreds of millions of dollars, Sherron Watkins decided
she should go to the top to report her discovery. But the top
levels of Enron management, she ultimately found out, were the
actual source of the trouble.
Watkins, a former vice president of the now-infamous
energy-trading giant, told electric cooperative leaders gathered
for the recent National Rural Electric Cooperative Association
(NRECA) annual meeting that she naively thought Enron Chairman
Ken Lay was unaware of the fraud.
“I knew he was an asleep-at-the-switch
manager,” she said, noting Lay in the fall of 2001 was
just stepping back into the top management post following the
resignation of CEO Jeff Skilling. “I thought, ‘I
need to just ward him.’ My reactions were not too different
from, say, a crew member on the Titanic.”
She knew the company had hit an iceberg, there
was water coming in, and that the ship was sinking. “I
was just trying to warn the captain, ‘Go man the lifeboats.
Try to save jobs. Try to save some business lines.’”
To her astonishment, instead of forming a
crisis management team, Lay hired a law firm to look into Watkins’
allegations—but not to examine the accounting. “This
law firm was hired to look into whether or not I was bringing
up any new facts,” Watkins told the co-op crown assembled
at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando, Florida.
“In effect, he reassured me that we were unsinkable, but
‘Nobody go down and see if there’s a hole.’”
Enron, the flagship energy marketer, sank
into bankruptcy a couple of months after Watkins discovered
the accounting breach, dragging down 5,000 employees, a major
accounting firm, countless clients, and those at the helm.
Shell Game
Watkins, a certified public accountant, had
worked for the Arthur Andersen accounting firm prior to being
hired by Enron. (The Andersen firm, one of the five largest
in the country and Enron’s auditor, was ultimately decimated
when it became known the company had signed off on Enron’s
“creative” accounting.) She began her Enron voyage
in 1993, becoming a vice president in charge of a billion-dollar
asset portfolio and later spending three years traveling the
globe for Enron International, looking into financing power
plants abroad.
Wanting to scale back her travel and work
schedule so she could spend more time with her family, in the
summer of 2001 Watkins took what she thought would be a low-risk,
“back office” job with Enron Chief Financial Officer
Andrew Fastow.
“Andy put me in charge of a list of assets
Enron was trying to sell to raise money to lower debt,”
Watkins explained. “I ran across 12 assets that were hedged
with an entity called the Raptors.” As she dug, she found
the Raptors were just shell companies—just on paper only.
They had no cash, no assets, and their only positive attribute
was a promise of Enron stock in the future.
“These Raptor structures had agreed to
buy these 12 Enron assets at a pretty high price. The spreadsheet
I was looking at just didn’t add up,” she continued,
referring to one column that “stuck out like a sore thumb,”
showing a $300 million Enron loss. “I met with people
who spent three hours trying to explain very, very complex business
structures to me, and I could tell that they didn’t quite
even understand.”
The complexity of the business schemes helped
Enron intimidate employees and clients who thought to raise
questions, Watkins related. People were afraid to show ignorance
at not understanding, and so they kept quiet.
Cooking the Books
“I had the benefit of stumbling across
them when their flaws were readily apparent,” said Watkins.
“I’m a CPA, and though I hadn’t practiced
accounting in a long time, I knew there’s just no way
accounting gets that creative—when you set up a shell
company, fund it with your own stock, and start doing business
with it. I knew what I was looking at was fraud.”
She said she figured going to then-CEO Jeff
Skilling would yield nothing, since he would have likely been
in on the scheming. However, he surprised her by quitting Enron
just two weeks after she had discovered the company was “cooking
the books.” The fact he had only been in the CEO’s
chair for 8 months (following a 10-year career where he strove
for that top spot) told Watkins, “What I was seeing was
far worse than I could have ever imagined.” That’s
when she went to Ken Lay and when he essentially confirmed her
worst fears about how broad—and high—the unethical
practices extended.
“In Enron’s case it involved hundreds
of employees; it involved Arthur Andersen, the outside auditors;
the outside lawyers; and the country’s largest banks,”
she said. “CitiGroup and Chase were fined $300 million
by the SEC for, in effect, aiding and abetting Enron and its
fraudulent schemes.” Both those banks paid more than $2
billion to settle shareholder litigation connected to their
role with Enron, Watkins continued.
She detailed some other outcomes of the subsequent
investigations. For instance, there were more than 30 guilty
pleas or indictments of Enron executives. CFO Andy Fastow, accused
of 99 criminal counts, plead guilty and will go to prison for
10 years. His wife, a former Enron assistant treasurer, has
already spent a year in prison for aiding her husband. Pending
trials in Houston feature Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay as defendants.
Three bankers have been extradited from Britain, charged with
helping Enron in its illegal schemes. There are Merrill Lynch
bankers in prison for their roles.
“There are other Enron trial to come,”
Watkins told the co-op crowd. “I never thought I would
know so many felons.”
Reaping Wreckage
The worst part, she said, was viewing the human
cost of the Enron shipwreck. The day after the December 2, 2001,
bankruptcy filing, 5,000 employees were told their last paycheck
would be the one from the previous Friday, and they should clear
their desks of personal items and leave. “That was three
weeks before Christmas, and people aren’t hiring at the
end of the year. This was devastating news,” she recalled.
However, the grim tidings were amplified a
month later when it was learned that 25 Enron executives had
paid themselves a total of $55 million in bonuses just one week
before the bankruptcy. “They feathered their nests and
they told 5,000 people, ‘I’m so sorry to tell you
this, but we’ve got nothing more for you,’”
said Watkins. “How had I spent eight years at a company
where a culture had gotten that rotten?”
As to the source of the decay, Watkins clearly
points to the executive suite: “In a perverse way, Ken
Lay was telling his executives, ‘When you get to the top,
the company’s assets are here for you to move around and
use for you and your family.’ And Andy Fastow heard that,”
Watkins remarked. “So any kind of erosion in values at
the top gets amplified in the trenches.”—Perry Baird
|
TOP
EDITORIAL
by Perry Baird
Enron Enormity
|
| While photographers
zero in, Sherron Watkins begins her talk to an attentive
NRECA annual meeting crowd. |
Projected high on the wall at one side of the
cavernous convention center hall were the electric co-op symbol
and Touchstone Energy logo, flanked by the words “members”
and “accountability.” The projection remained focused
there for all three days of the National Rural Electric Cooperative
Association (NRECA) annual meeting, but for the closing session,
the words seemed to shine with particular emphasis.
Sherron Watkins, a former vice president with
Enron, took the stage to tell the 10,000 electric co-op representatives
and guests how the energy-trading firm imploded from what she
termed “a complete breakdown of moral values.”
“I feel at home with cooperative audiences,”
she began. “I know I’m not in the middle of cutthroat
business executives who are focusing on their own bottom line
and are greedy.”
Core Concepts
Watkins’ tale of corrupt executives who plundered assets
from customers and their own employees (see story on page 14)
stood in sharp contrast to values espoused by cooperative businesses.
“One of the main reasons I like talking to co-op audiences
is that your priorities are in the right place. You really are
looking out for your members’ best interests. It’s
not for profit,” she remarked to the audience at the Orange
County Convention Center in Orlando.
Outsiders regarded Enron as a high-powered, innovative company,
Watkins said, relating that its stated core values were respect,
integrity, communication, and excellence. “They were very
similar to your own marching orders,” she told the co-op
crowd. “And now Enron is known as the byword for “corporate
scandal.”
Watkins said in big companies such as Enron, internal procedures
are designed to help management identify ethically challenged
employees. “That’s so you can rid yourself of them,”
she said. “It seems like a harsh lesson, but it’s
the best thing you can do.” Second chances, reprimands,
salary penalties, or demotions will only teach employees that
they can get away with detected ethical lapses, according to
Watkins, and they will just go into “stealth mode”
with the next breach they try.
Good Riddance
Her discussion of “getting rid of employees” reminded
me of a statement made five years ago by none other than Enron
CEO Jeff Skilling during the company’s heyday.
As the ill-fated push to deregulate the entire electric industry
was underway, Skilling uttered an infamous remark, telling that
his recipe for making the industry competitive included simply
“getting rid of” large numbers of utility workers.
He wasn’t talking about ethically challenged ones, mind
you, but regular folks on the payroll. It foretold the inhumane
character that Enron managers would display toward their own
employees at the end.
As Watkins noted, the trouble with internal procedures in
Enron’s case is that they were not designed to target
high enough on the executive ladder. Had they been, Skilling
himself could have topped Enron’s list of “rid of”
employees—and years earlier than his 2001 departure as
the company began its collapse.
The business methods—and mission— of electric
cooperatives mesh in a way Watkins says should be a model for
business everywhere. “You’re trying to make lives
better, and I think that grows on itself,” she exclaimed.
“Good breeds more good; bad breeds more bad.”
|
TOP

Jurustic Park
Junk to “Iron Age” Creatures
Several years ago, I was driving just north
of Marshfield when my attention was riveted by hundreds of rust-colored
statues, big and small, plus an enchanting wood and rock cottage
that looked as if it were borrowed right out of a fairy tale.
Several people were in the yard, walking and
talking among the statues. I parked and entered the premises.
There, I heard their creator, Clyde Wynia, spin tall tales about
the so-called “histories” of each fanciful sculpture.
Wynia, a retired lawyer, is now happily pursuing
his hobby of paleontology (the study of ancient life forms and
old fossils). With tongue in cheek, he describes his creations
as “now-extinct creatures that inhabited the large McMillan
Marsh” nearby, claiming that all the marsh creatures have
“flesh and bones” of ferrous metal.
All the sculptures have elaborate stories,
and Wynia is more than eager to share them with visitors. For
instance, a statue of a human skeleton called Fast Eddy Biscotti
is described as “a Norwegian gunfight in the marsh in
the 1800s.” Further, claims Fast Eddy’s creator,
“He never lost a fight, until the last time he was challenged
to a draw. Just as the two fighters drew their weapons, Eddy
was momentarily distracted by (the other gunfighter’s)
cleavage, and she put an arrow through his heart.”
Similar sagas are supplied for each of the
sculptures, from the tiny frogs to the Creature of the Marsh,
more than 11 feet tall, which has recently been on loan to the
Mitchel Conservatory (“The Domes”) in Milwaukee
for its Merlin Show.
While Wynia continues to sculpt and spin yarns,
his wife, Nancy, spins natural fibers, which she also dyes and
knits into garments. A retired nurse, she inhabits the fairytale
Hobbit House on the grounds of Jurustic Park. There, she also
crafts and sells her colorful glass beads and jewelry, fish,
flowers, and life-size soft sculptures.
So if you fancy fancies, don’t just
rent a “Lord of the Rings” movie. Instead, motor
over to Marshfield and get lost in Wynia’s sculptures
at Jurustic Park. The critters are for sale, but it’s
up to you decide what to believe about their origin—and
it’s up to you to get your purchases home. Wynia has a
firm policy against providing shipping for his denizens of the
marsh.—Linda Hilton
Jurustic Park is open
most days in spring, summer, and fall until 5 p.m. (Group tours
may be booked by appointment.) It’s located four miles
north of Marshfield. From Hwy. 97 at the north edge of Marshfield,
turn on Hwy. E and travel north for 3-1/2 miles. Turn left on
Sugarbush Lane for half a mile until sculptures appear on the
right at M222 Sugarbush Lane. The site is located across from
Foxfire Gardens. For more information, visit www.jurustic.com
or call 715/387-1653.
|
TOP
|