WECN Front Page
HOME
This month's Issue CURRENT ISSUE
WECN RECIPES
RECIPES
WECN WISCONSIN EVENTS
EVENTS
WECN Archives
ARCHIVES
WECN HISTORY
HISTORY
WECN SEARCH ENGINE
SEARCH
Contact Us
CONTACT US
December 2006 Issue
Feature 1

GOING WITH
THE GRAIN

Feature 2

RIGHT FROM
THE START

Editorial

EDITORIAL

Wisconsin Favorites

Wisconsin Favorites
Old-Fashioned Christmas
Starts at Farm

ARCHIVES

 

 

 

 

Going with the Grain
Cooperative Approach gets Ethanol Plant Up and Running

Rising above the cornfields near Boyceville on a brisk fall day, the stack at Western Wisconsin Energy trails a plume of steam. The cotton ball-white streamer means the plant below is busy, turning out what other practitioners of this art sometimes refer to as “corn squeezin’s,” at the enviable rate of about 80 gallons per minute. Across a year, that number works out to 42 million gallons of ethanol, destined to lose every bit of its entertainment value to a denaturing dose of gasoline before leaving the plant on its journey to American motorists’ fuel tanks.

Western Wisconsin Energy (WWE) is neither the first ethanol plant proposed in Dunn County nor was it built without controversy. A few years ago, efforts to site a similar plant on the edge of Menomonie were defeated by local opposition. There are those who believe the Boyceville plant succeeded where the first attempt failed because WWE was organized as a cooperative and the Menomonie project was not.

Patience Pays

Jim Hathaway is one of those who believe the co-op approach was a factor in winning community acceptance of the WWE facility. He’s also a believer in the benefits to be derived by the local economy.

“I think this will be a tremendous boon to the area,” says Hathaway, president of the Dunn County Economic Development Commission as well as general manager and CEO of Menomonie-based Dunn Energy Cooperative. The organizers of WWE, Hathaway adds, “have to be the most patient people in the world to have gone through what they did to get this built.” Minutes later, as a walking tour of the plant begins, Hathaway explains the meaning of what the organizers had “gone through.”

They had to have respectful answers for project opponents claiming the steam plume—perhaps a hundred feet above ground and stretching about the same distance laterally—would cause pilots to become disoriented and crash on approaching or departing the Boyceville airport three miles away.

They had to respond to worries about noise levels, which, in reality, make conversation difficult within the plant but quickly diminish a few yards outside.

And they had to answer concerns that the fermenting operation would pollute the air with offensive odors.

The aroma of yeast becomes apparent as we near the plant on foot; it’s not exactly the same as bread rising but not terribly dissimilar. Hathaway laughs, “That was one of the big issues, how bad it was going to stink.”

The Kernel of an Idea

The creation of Western Wisconsin Energy was first discussed in the summer of 2001 among farmers who had been meeting for several years as a grain-marketing club. One member, Paul Harrison, said the failure of the Menomonie project combined with the club’s grain-marketing experiences “got us thinking about value-added.”

Enthusiasm was evident at an exploratory meeting that drew about 75 area farmers, and in December 2001 WWE incorporated as a cooperative.

The original 530 members raised $14.5 million to get the $60 million project off the ground. Shares were sold based on commitments to deliver corn to the cooperative or take away the spent corn, known in the trade as “distiller’s grain.” Governance is by an eight-member board divided by districts and serving staggered, three-year terms. The ratio of members to directors is roughly 80–1.

Now president and CEO, Harrison credits board members for advancing their idea along the rocky road to fruition, noting that they “always strived to do the project well, in a way that’s very sellable, so people look at it and say that’s a project worth getting involved with.” Meeting as a board every week for two years, “they respected each other’s opinion even if it was 180 degrees from theirs,” Harrison adds.

He also credits former State Representative and Agriculture Secretary LaVerne Ausman of Elk Mound, who served as executive director of the co-op during its developmental stages and exercised his personal contacts and persuasive powers to bring people on board.

“LaVerne knows 75 percent of the people in Wisconsin,” Harrison says. “Our success is significantly due to who he is and what he is.”

All of which is a nice way of saying none of this was easy. The arguments recounted by Jim Hathaway had to be addressed and re-addressed over a period of years. In addition, the plant’s energy efficiency was disputed: Opponents claimed it would take more energy to produce the ethanol than it would yield as a finished product. Opponents also predicted a negative impact on property values. Paul Harrison says that’s since been refuted by real estate advertisements describing local properties as “near the ethanol plant.”

Not surprisingly, extended wrangling before government bodies preceded construction. The local Board of Adjustments granted a special zoning exemption and project opponents appealed the decision. Changing its approach, the cooperative decided to seek industrial zoning instead of the exemption.

The moment of decision came at a meeting of the Dunn County board in June 2005. An overflow crowd of area residents appeared and co-op leaders obtained permission to make a show of support. They read no speeches, staged no protests, but a long line of citizens holding signs in favor of the project quietly walked single file through the board room and back out again. With broader enthusiasm for WWE than some might have suspected, supervisors voted 29–0 to rezone 125 acres as industrial.

The Daily Grind

WWE started grinding corn September 6, 2006, and had ethanol in storage three days later.

Harrison dismisses the idea that the distillation process is a net energy loser. “Not true,” he says. “In older plants, you can get 1.3 Btu [British Thermal Units] out of the ethanol for every one Btu used in producing it. This plant gets 1.6 Btu out for every one Btu in and may get to an efficiency as high as two to one.”

During a fall visit, the plant was operating at better than anticipated efficiency, turning out an annualized production of about 42 million gallons, two million more than its rated capacity.

A key element of early planning was to make sure enough corn would be available to support this production. It turned out not to be a problem. A 10-county feasibility study determined that after the needs of major area corn consumers (poultry producers at Barron and Arcadia and other significant users and exit points within a 60-mile radius of Boyceville) were met, there should still be 40 million bushels available to meet the plant’s 15-million bushel annual requirement.

“Instead of shipping this down the [Mississippi] river, why not use it locally?” Harrison asks.

But early operations proved an exception to the anticipated rule. With local harvests curtailed by drought, corn was being purchased outside the area. Even so, according to General Manager Steve Christensen, this fall saw deliveries of 80–100 truckloads of corn per day in addition to that brought from greater distances by rail.

The manufacturing process begins in a facility where corn is unloaded and distiller’s grain is loaded for removal. Attached to this and looming about two stories high is a filtration structure called a “baghouse,” capturing the dust from loading operations. “We wanted to be good neighbors,” Christensen explains, pointing out that the plant uses the best available control technology—or BACT in state and federal regulatory jargon—to keep its emissions clean.

After distillation, the corn still has uses. Much of the distiller’s grain is shipped out by rail to feedlots across the Midwest. Harrison registers the mild complaint that railroad cars tend not to show up “as fast as we had hoped,” but he also notes the potential of using more spent grain within the region. There might be enough cattle to use all of it in the 10-county area surrounding the plant, he says.

Part of it is already being used locally as cattle feed at the Five-Star Dairy near Elk Mound. There, methane produced in a manure digester fuels an on-farm generator pumping about 750 kilowatts of electricity into the Dairyland Power Cooperative system. The byproduct of one renewable energy operation helps run another.

Similar efficiencies are realized inside the plant itself. Christensen points out that while natural gas is the basic heat source for grain-drying and distillation, the process yields methane and that gas is collected and used for fuel as well.

A side benefit is enhanced electric reliability for the area. Because of the WWE plant’s power requirement—estimated at 30–35 million kilowatt-hours annually—Dunn Energy has invested about half a million dollars in distribution system improvements and Dairyland has installed a dedicated substation on the premises. That substation strengthens the grid by providing an additional path to support power demand if severe weather or some other mishap should bring down a line or knock out another substation, Christensen says.

Complex Chemistry

WWE relies on an employee roster of 37 people, recruited mainly from local communities and earning at least $14 per hour plus full benefits. Working four shifts daily, they keep distillation going 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

Thanks to computers, electronic controls, and sensors, it takes only four people to run the basic process. Other employees include an environmental health and safety technician, lab technicians, and a plant manager. A separate office facility a hundred yards away houses management personnel and staff including a marketer, corn buyer, and chief financial officer.

“Everybody is cross-trained so if someone is sick, they can fill in,” Harrison says.

The biggest customer for WWE’s output is the Murphy Oil Company refinery at Duluth, Minnesota, about 120 miles north. Much of the product makes a longer trip, to refineries as far away as Missouri and Arizona.

To ensure a steady supply of ethanol to these clients, enough corn is kept on hand to run the plant for eight to 10 days. Planned additional storage will extend corn reserves to a 30-day supply.

Inside the WWE plant, the chemistry isn’t overly complicated. Yeast and warm water convert corn into a fermentable mash that is boiled to extract and collect the resulting alcohol. Outside the plant, the chemistry of matching project with community was considerably more complex, as confirmed by the failure at Menomonie and the five years of toil between concept and construction at Boyceville.

But as Jim Hathaway observes, the cooperative approach seems to have served the participants well. “To me,” he says, “that’s the biggest success story—that they persevered.”
Dave Hoopman

TOP

Right from the Start
Customers Keep Lid on Restructuring Schemes

A decade ago, Wisconsin’s electric cooperatives and several allied organizations founded the Customers First! Coalition to advocate a deliberative approach to what then looked like an unstoppable tide of electric utility restructuring.

Helping Customers First! realize its goal of preserving Wisconsin consumers’ access to reliable, affordable electricity have been the broad spectrum of interests and opinions represented in the coalition’s membership, state legislators and administrations declining to make utility issues a partisan football, and the timely disintegration of California’s restructuring adventure.

In recent years, the coalition has hosted an annual fall conference on energy issues. The fourth such event, held in Madison in October, featured insightful presentations on electric restructuring efforts in two key Midwestern states and the status of the nation’s fastest-growing energy source.

Wind On the Upswing

With continuing debate about the best fuel choices to meet growing electricity demand, it may be surprising to learn the energy source that’s growing fastest doesn’t use fuel.

John Dunlop of the American Wind Energy Association delivered that news at the Customers First! energy conference.

“Public policy is the major driver worldwide for wind development,” Dunlop said, acknowledging that tax subsidies have been the primary spur. Be that as it may, they’re an effective spur. The U.S. now has 10 gigawatts (10 billion watts) of wind generation, to rank third worldwide after Germany and Spain.

The 23 megawatts of wind generation installed in Wisconsin between 1998 and 2002 may be dwarfed by another 1,000 megawatts (one gigawatt) on the drawing board. For some of the larger projects, permits have been issued; others await regulatory approval.

However, Dunlop identifies a need that’s sure to spark controversy. “Transmission capacity is the main impediment to wind development. We need more transmission to get wind energy to the market,” he says.

He endorsed a $500 billion program he said would be needed to obtain 20 percent of U.S. electricity from wind. That would equal 35 times the nation’s current wind energy output.

Ohio Experiment Collapsing

Billed as deregulation, the reality of utility restructuring has been some aspects of the industry deregulated while others are regulated—or manipulated—more intensely than before. Love it or hate it, “deregulation” hardly describes what’s happened when a state legislature sets retail electric rates, as several have.

Embraced by about half the states, restructuring has generally failed to deliver the promised competition for the customer dollar. Local communities in Ohio aggregating their residents into electricity-purchasing groups were for several years among the few bright spots in the overall disappointment of restructuring, but according to one of the Ohio experiment’s closest observers, those bright spots are fading away.

Ohio adopted its restructuring plan at the end of the 1990s. Sam Randazzo, general counsel for the Industrial Energy Users of Ohio, says his state “took a leap of faith and had it waited one more year, probably would have made a different decision.”

Ohioans are “fundamentally disappointed” with the results of their “complex and very thoughtful plan,” Randazzo told the Customers First! annual energy conference.

Hitting home for residential ratepayers is concern over the impending arrival of full retail competition—without any competitors in sight.

Alternative power suppliers—initially attracted by the prospect of a competitive environment—have pulled out, Randazzo said, and Ohio is scheduled to convert completely to market-based pricing January 1, 2009, with no alternative suppliers currently in the state. Most of the aggregation programs in which local governments allowed residents to opt in or out of purchasing pools are “collapsing,” he noted.

Randazzo added that policy makers should remember that to obtain lower prices and better service for customers, either competition or regulation could work, given the right circumstances. “They are tools, not ends in themselves,” he said.

Illinois: No Choice But To Act

They’re still arguing in Illinois about whether that state’s 1999 restructuring law will help or hurt retail electric consumers. But even one of the harshest critics of the results so far agrees there was no choice: Something had to be done.

Restructuring was the right thing to do at the time “because the system was a mess,” David Kolata, executive director of the Illinois Citizens Utility Board told the October Customers First! conference.

Illinois customers were paying much higher retail rates than those in neighboring states and utilities were not performing well—for instance, Kolata noted that Commonwealth Edison’s nuclear plants were operating at about 40-percent efficiency, a figure that’s improved to about 90 percent since restructuring.

Unfortunately, competition for the customer dollar was a benefit that failed to materialize, he said. “Customers have no choice and still have no sense of what happens next.”

What happens next could be mammoth rate hikes in January as utilities escape the constraints of the 1997 restructuring law’s legislated 20-percent rate reduction and freeze on the reduced rates.

Before January comes, Illinoisans could see a special legislative session to extend the rate freeze and otherwise alter the law. “Competition at the retail level is nonexistent,” Kolata says. “At the wholesale level, it’s dubious at best.”

No State Immune

Wisconsin may congratulate itself for not climbing onto the restructuring bandwagon, but can we continue to exist in glorious isolation, or will the difficulties faced by some of our neighbors inevitably come lapping at our shores?

Sam Randazzo predicts the latter. Immune to amendment by legislative or regulatory bodies, the laws of physics require electricity production and consumption to be kept constantly in balance. Moreover, these laws don’t care whether a state has chosen retail competition or traditional regulation; nor do they care where regulators have drawn wholesale market boundaries. The real market boundaries are defined by interconnections between transmission systems, Randazzo says, and the necessary consumption-production balance gives supply-and-demand principles an especially firm grip.

Moreover, he noted, wholesale prices are now based on the cost of power from the last generating unit brought on line to meet current demand—inevitably the least efficient unit—creating a “perverse incentive” not to improve efficiency.

States that haven’t restructured remain interconnected with states that have, Randazzo says, warning that absent intervention by federal regulators, “these [restructuring] problems will land on your doorstep—they will simply arrive in a different form.—Dave Hoopman

TOP

EDITORIAL
by Perry Baird

Principle Promotion

Wisconsin’s E.G. Nadeau, a contributor to the OCDC study, provided this photo showing members of a vegetable co-op in Ghana, one nation where regulatory reform is needed.

Wisconsin cooperative leaders came away from their statewide association’s recent annual meeting understanding how some co-ops are successfully enhancing business by promoting their cooperative character.

“Marketing the Cooperative Difference,” the Wisconsin Federation of Cooperatives’ (WFC) annual meeting theme, served up an opportunity for representatives of Touchstone Energy, Florida’s Natural, Organic Valley, the United Kingdom’s premier cooperative council, and others to describe sophisticated branding campaigns that center on democratic principles common to all cooperatives. The success stories reinforced known public tendencies to favor democratic control, member participation, and other basic attributes of co-op business. Resources spent and results achieved in comprehensive marketing have been impressive, the Midwestern co-op leaders learned.

Decisive Difference

But besides helping secure increasing market share in the business world, spreading the word on cooperative benefits is making real gains in improving the lives of people around the world. WFC Board Chairman Ed Brooks referenced the “cooperative necessity” in his address to delegates at the recent gathering. An example he raised is the same one we feature this month beginning on page 10—the new ethanol cooperative near Boyceville. Brooks pointed out that an economic solution based on the cooperative model succeeded in the community where an earlier, conventional business approach had failed to gain public acceptance.

U.S. cooperatives enjoy a generally favorable regulatory climate in which they can tout their advantages and gain economically. That’s not the case globally, although it’s an inequity now under scrutiny.

Just a month ago, an effort to reform laws and regulations that work against cooperatives internationally rolled out in a report by the Overseas Cooperative Development Council (OCDC), a group that includes representatives of U.S. electric co-ops.

Reforms Abroad

“In many countries, co-ops are recognized as public sector institutions rather than private sector enterprises,” the OCDC report noted. “The laws that govern them are often overly prescriptive and fail to address critical factors for safety and growth.” Cited as an example was the African nation of Ghana, where co-ops are subjected to a six-month probationary period during formation, which (due to unwieldy bureaucracies and corruption) could stretch into years. A Zambian law grants a government official the power to appoint those who manage co-ops; in Nicaragua, people must attend 40 hours of training just to become co-op members.

Advocating removal of such barriers, the report emphasizes legal reform based on principles that protect democratic member control, autonomy, independence, and due process; promote equitable access to markets; respect voluntary membership; require economic participation; and provide an effective regulatory framework. The platform tracks closely with basic, long-established co-op business principles and known benefits.

With cooperative organizations stateside and abroad contributing to the report, it also enlists a principle—one the co-ops’ seven guiding standards—under which the most effective advocacy is made possible: cooperation among cooperatives.

TOP

 

 

You say your recent holidays have featured a fake Christmas tree that spends the rest of the year in the attic? Or a real but dried-out tree that you picked up from a lot in town? If so, it’s time to treat your kids (or grown-up friends) to a trip to a tree farm, where you can spend an invigorating day choosing and cutting down the one fresh tree among hundreds that seems the perfect one for you.

One great place for your family to choose at tree is Lowes Creek tree Farm, near Eleva. This enterprise is not only family-owned and -operated by Tim and Therese Olsen and their family; it also is on electric cooperative lines and has more than the ordinary co-op ties. The Olsens’ daughter, Signey, is a youth anbassador for the Eau Claire Energy Cooperative and is currently the secretary of the Wisconsin Electric Cooperative Association Youth Board.

At the 240-acre Lowes Creek Tree Farm, your family will be treated to a festive beginning to your holidays. The farm is open daily now until December 23, but weekends are special. On weekends in December (Friday through Sunday), there will be free horse-drawn wagons (or sleighs, if there’s enough snow) to the tree fields. Farm animals join in the fun on weekends at the kids’ play area, with its 200-bale straw fort and tunnel pile and more traditional playground equipment. For the romantically inclined, the Olsens’ offer romantic moonlight sleigh rides (by reservation only) on the first three Friday and Saturday evenings in December. A local fundraising group offers a hotdog/brat stand the first week in December.

If you can’t make it on a weekend, there’s still plenty of Christmas cheer on the remaining days. Free hot cider and candy canes are offered at all times, and the hand-scribed Norwegian-style Log Cabin Gift Shop offers distinctive gifts, decorations, collectible Santas, and more. Lowes Creek also makes wreaths and roping, and a friendly staff is on hand to help you select, cut, shake, bale, and load your Christmas tree. No wonder this family-oriented tree farm has been featured in Midwest Living!

Not too far away from Lowes Creek Tree Farm is the Pleasant Valley Tree Farms in rural Elk Mound. There, you can also choose and cut your own tree (or select from many types of pre-cut trees, if you must). Pleasant Valley is also open daily through December 23, and offers many types of gifts and decor in the Country Store. Free cider, cocoa, and popcorn are offered during the holiday season along with wagon rides to the tree fields. The first December weekend will also offer a living nativity, and customers during the first two weekends of the month may enjoy a food stand. Purchased campfire picnic packs give groups all the fixins’ to have an old-fashioned weiner roast out in the field. Santa and Mrs. Claus will also visit from noon to 3 p.m on the first Saturday and Sunday in December.

If you’re not near either of these tree farms, don’t despair. There are friendly tree farms in nearly every county in Wisconsin (see Internet site below for further information). Any one of them can guarantee to beat the fake fir tree in your attic, so get started now for a happy old-fashioned holiday.

—Linda Hilton, photos courtesy of Lowes Creek Tree Farm and Pleasant Valley Tree Farms

Lowes Creek Tree Farm is located 5 miles south of Eau Claire (S. 9475 Lowes Creek Road, Eleva, WI 54738). For directions to the farm, hours, and other information, visit www.lowescreektreefarm.com or call 888/878-4166. Pleasant Valley Tree Farms is at N7240 810th St., Elk Mound, WI 54739 (www.pleasantvalleytree.com; 715/879-5179). For other tree farms close to you, visit www.pickyourownchristmastree.org, then specify Wisconsin and search by area of the state.) It’s always a good idea to telephone to make sure the tree farm you select will be open at the time you wish to visit.

 

TOP

©2008 Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News