WECN Front Page
HOME
This month's Issue CURRENT ISSUE
WECN RECIPES
RECIPES
WECN WISCONSIN EVENTS
EVENTS
WECN Archives
ARCHIVES
WECN HISTORY
HISTORY
WECN SEARCH ENGINE
SEARCH
Contact Us
CONTACT US
March 2006 Issue
Feature 1

SKY HIGH

Feature 2

PENDING
PROPOSITIONS

Editorial

EDITORIAL

Wisconsin Favorites

Wisconsin Favorites
Rediscovering your
roots can be recreational.

ARCHIVES

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

 

 

 

 

Sky High

We know where global energy demand is heading;
ditto energy costs. Can supply catch up?

The impulse is to say you enjoyed the presentation, but that wouldn’t be quite right. Even if it’s the most concise, trenchant analysis yet, nobody enjoys hearing global energy demand is headed straight up, while U.S. domestic production is flat or falling. Nobody, that is, who’s your friend.

“Sobering” is the word Dave Mohre chooses to characterize his professional assessment of the energy supply and demand picture.

Mohre is executive director of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association’s Energy and Power Division. With natural gas prices near all-time highs and restrained from new records only by the good fortune of a mostly mild winter, the outlook he lays before participants at the recent Wisconsin Electric Cooperative Association Education and Lobby Days in Madison is sobering, indeed.

No Longer Alone

An attentive audience is guaranteed by Mohre’s reminder that even though last year’s hurricanes played a clearly identifiable role in driving up energy costs, they didn’t start the trend, and the gradual fadeout of their effects won’t end it.

“Just before Katrina the [natural gas futures-market price per million BTUs] was about nine dollars,” he says. “Not surprisingly after Katrina it spiked to about twelve dollars. But Katrina did not cause the price of gas to go from two dollars to basically nine dollars,” where it had returned as he made his presentation at the end of January.

The long climb began in January 2002 and the peak, so far, was reached last December at about $15. That’s more than seven times the price during the late 1990s when independent energy producers began building fleets of gas-fired merchant power plants across the U.S. It’s no coincidence that that the building boom outlasted the low gas prices and industry-restructuring enthusiasm that sparked it—or that many independents have gone bankrupt.

Mohre notes, “In the past five years we’ve built more than 200,000 megawatts of brand-spanking new gas-fired electric generation facilities” in the United States, meaning that “at the margin, gas is the fuel being used in just about every region of the country,” and, “the price of electricity is tied directly to the price of natural gas.”

Mohre’s analysis makes clear that Wisconsin’s energy-isolation, thanks to Great Lakes geography and a weak transmission system, and the growing challenges facing the United States in global competition for energy supplies are inseparable parts of a single picture. The nation can no longer count on being at the top of the food chain in energy import markets, and geography no longer defines Wisconsin’s energy market as our own generation capacity supplemented by whatever we can buy across the state line from Commonwealth Edison. We’re no longer alone. Today’s market has overwhelmed yesterday’s, and rather than hold its effects at bay, our electrical isolation intensifies them.

Wisconsin is no longer alone because federal energy policies since the mid-1990s have pushed development of next-day or “Day-2” regional wholesale electricity markets with rapidly fluctuating prices, and they have reinforced natural gas as the fuel of choice. That’s by far the most expensive fuel right now, and today’s wholesale market tacks on an extra premium for the difficulty of delivering power through this state’s underbuilt and congested transmission system.

Americans are no longer alone as the world’s pre-eminent energy consumers because other nations’ economies are growing at a phenomenal pace.

Mohre visited China recently and reports that Shanghai has more new industrial plants under construction than we’ve built in the U.S. in the past five years. Beijing is at work on its seventh “outer beltway.” Together, he notes, the two cities hold five times as many people as New York, and growth in India is not far behind.

That adds up to unprecedented competition for the world’s output of oil and natural gas, including the liquefied form (LNG). While the U.S. generates little electricity from oil and is only beginning to get serious about importing LNG, higher prices for one fuel can spur more demand—and higher prices—for others.

Day 2=Tomorrow Never Comes

Fuel may be costly but it’s also a necessity. Power producers must meet the need and find alternatives to moderate the price. Infrastructure is another matter, and Mohre believes the industry model promoted by federal regulators for the past two decades deters needed investment.

Regional transmission operators and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) focus on real-time information on the wholesale price of power delivered at thousands of points across the country “and ignore the fact that the industry is a 30-year, 40-year industry where you invest in your generation and your transmission lines. That’s not a short-term investment, that’s a long-term investment,” he says.

“FERC is saying we’re going to send the right price signals that change every five minutes and you’re going to base your investment decisions on that.” Noting that a recent three-hour period saw the price of power delivered at one U.S. location vary $700 per megawatt-hour, he says, “That’s why things are not getting built.”

Less able than investor-owned utilities to pass on costs, electric cooperatives with growing membership face a more straightforward choice between volatile wholesale markets and building new generation. Nationwide, co-ops have about $21 billion in generation facilities on the drawing board, mainly coal-fired and all in response to member growth, Mohre says.

Playing Catch-Up

“Energy Independence” is a popular rhetorical phrase but the graphs nearby, depicting data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, show domestic gas production rising slowly, domestic oil production flat or falling, and they predict widening gaps between production and consumption of both.

Responding to audience questions about how many years of gas reserves exist in the U.S., Dave Mohre says, “I don’t think anybody knows.”

“We can’t even do test drills in two-thirds of our coastal area. We might be sitting on top of more oil and gas than Saudi Arabia. We don’t know,” he says, quickly adding, “I’m not saying it’s right or wrong, I’m just saying what is.”

His parting remark is this: “Our balancing of energy and environmental interests is probably the most difficult discussion we have, politically, in this country today, and we’ve got to figure it out or we won’t have an economy to worry about.”

Less than 48 hours later and as if to underline Mohre’s point, Florida’s two U.S. Senators—one Democrat, one Republican—introduced legislation to permanently ban drilling in a small Gulf Coast area believed to hold as much as seven trillion cubic feet of natural gas.—Dave Hoopman

TOP


Pending Propositions

Co-ops Press Legislature As Session Wanes

With only 15 days remaining of floor action before closing down regular business for the 2005—2006 biennium, the Wisconsin Legislature has a pile of pending proposals that could impact cooperatively owned utilities. During a February 8 “lobby day” in Madison, hundreds of electric co-op directors and staff dropped in on members of the Senate and Assembly, urging action on several matters before session’s end.

Topping the list was alerting lawmakers to an expected bill encompassing recommendations of the Governor’s Task Force on Energy Efficiency and Renewables. The measure—still in the drafting stage as co-op leaders met—would boost renewable energy and tighten oversight of utility public-benefits funds.

Major provisions include a mandatory 10-percent share of renewables in the state’s energy mix that, unlike current law, will credit hydropower as a renewable resource. The draft preserves commitment-to-community programs for public benefits but calls for independent, third-party evaluation of how those programs are run.

Bills subjecting utility infrastructure to the property tax and elimination of discriminatory treatment of electric heat—issues never previously considered as part of the package—might be folded into the major bill as amendments, cooperators were told prior to their meetings with legislators.

Another key issue pressed by co-op lobbyists was an expected state resolution urging members of Congress to get behind pending federal legislation ending the railroad industry’s antitrust immunity—a first step in delivering the competition promised when rail carriers were deregulated in 1980. Discriminatory pricing of freight rates by railroads is seriously threatening Wisconsin utilities that have no other means of obtaining coal to run their power plants, the co-op representatives told state lawmakers.

Finally, cooperative leaders urged support of legislation mandating statewide electrician licensing as a means of ensuring safe and efficient electrical installations statewide. Following multiple drafts, a bill was expected to be introduced in mid-February with hearings to follow soon after. But the brief time left on the legislative calendar has shifted the co-ops’ focus from prompt passage to “getting people on board” for a bill to be offered next January.

 

TOP

EDITORIAL
by Perry Baird

Slow Cooking

Panelists brief electric co-op leaders on electrician licensing prior to State Capitol visits in February. From left, master electrician David Boetcher; IBEW Local 2150 lobbyist Forrest Ceel; Beata Kalies, Wisconsin Federation of Co-ops director of government affairs.

It’s been said that a new law is like sausage: The final product may be okay, but you don’t really want to see how it’s made.

Though probably not the prime consideration of whomever coined that observation, one reason the legislative process doesn’t captivate the average spectator is that it sometimes seems to take forever to go from the idea stage to formal public policy.

We note in a story on page 14 that electric co-op leaders in February pressed state lawmakers to support brand-new legislation aimed at requiring statewide licensing of electricians. The current legislative session counts only a handful of days remaining on which to conduct business, rendering remote the chances for the bill’s approval before adjournment. Undaunted, the co-op delegation used its time with senators and representatives to encourage support for the measure, even if the greatest prospects for passage might be in the next legislative session, convening in January 2007.

Meticulous, Methodical

Tardy timing of the legislation can be chalked up to authors, co-ops, and other key backers being painstakingly thorough in crafting bill language. They’ve gone through seven drafts during months of revisions, addressing as many concerns as possible prior to the bill’s introduction so that the measure wouldn’t get fatally hung up with amendments during formal legislative consideration.

If this sounds like the recipe for achieving statewide electrician licensing is taking a long time to prepare, consider that four years ago this month, we reported our co-op grassroots lobbyists were also urging lawmakers to support a bill that would license electricians. That measure ran out of time to be acted upon before the 2001–02 Legislature adjourned. Obviously, the objective embodied by the legislation has been simmering for some time.

Arguments for the bill remain compelling. Every year, there are deaths, injuries, and substantial losses in property due to unsafe, improper wiring, and Wisconsin law only makes it optional for municipalities to require that electrical work performed within their borders be done by licensed electricians.

A Question of Qualification

The Wisconsin Department of Commerce conducts a program for certifying master and journeyman electricians, but it’s an entirely voluntary system. David Boetcher, a master electrician and instructor of electrical apprenticeship, told the co-op leaders at a briefing prior to the February legislative visits that as far consumers know, the individual wiring their homes, “might have just gone to Menard’s, bought a wire stripper, and now calls himself an electrician.” And today that’s perfectly legal.

Boetcher points out Wisconsin currently licenses a throng of professions: barbers, manicurists, dance therapists, cemetery-plot salespeople, interior designers, plumbers, lawyers, doctors, real estate agents, security guards, and the list goes on. And he notes few of the duly licensed occupations have the potential to produce a more dangerous consequence for consumers than an improperly wired electrical system.

True, we can’t eliminate all electrical danger by licensing this group of trades people and professionals, but holding our electricians to a reasonable statewide standard would be a good start—whenever the cooking is done.

TOP

 

 

 

Events and values that shaped the lives of our ancestors are on display at the Chippewa Valley Museum, which offers educational and entertaining exhibits that shed light on the histories of various groups of citizens.

Situated in Eau Claire’s Carson Park, the Chippewa Valley Museum currently offers major exhibits tracing changes that have shaped the Ojibwe, the farmers, and the townspeople, who together have forged the fabric of life in the Chippewa Valley and much of Wisconsin.

“Paths of the People,” the museum’s first major exhibit, opened in 1991. It traces Ojibwe history over the last 300 years in the area. Visitors will learn about the Ojibwe traditions, their economy, their schools, and their treaties.

“Settlement and Survival” traces communities from their beginnings in the 1850s, when Yankee, Canadian, and European settlers flocked to the area to log the vast pine forests. Photos and exhibits depict the changing lives of the lumbermen, the businessmen, and their families, both in the forests and in their homes.

The latest major exhibit, “Farm Life,” opened in late 2004, tracing a century of change for farm families and rural settlements. Visitors will view the typical farmhouse, barn, fields, and local gathering spots as they explore how the political, economic, and cultural roots of the Chippewa Valley influence families today. The exhibit is not only educational, but fun, as participants can gather eggs, pretend to milk cows, visit a country dance hall, and watch a video of the Rhythm Playboys playing at a 1930s wedding.

To study changes in clothing style, visit “Full Reflection: Dress and Identity.” This exhibit shows garb from the 1890s to the 1990s. For children, there’s a dress-up area with reproductions of historic clothing.

Many other exhibits also draw kids and adults alike, such as a working model of a vintage soda fountain. Everyone marvels at Kate Aitken’s 21-room dollhouse and its fascinating tiny furnishings. On the grounds from mid-April through mid-October, visitors may tour the 1892 Sunnyvale School and the 1866 Lars and Grethe Anderson House.

Whoever visitors may be, they’re likely to enjoy rediscovering some of their own roots at the Chippewa Valley Museum.—Linda Hilton

During the school year, the Chippewa Valley Museum is open from 1–5 p.m. Tuesday through Sunday. It is also open Tuesday evenings until 8 p.m., with free admission on these evenings, and it opens early (10 a.m.) on Saturdays. The museum has extended hours from Memorial Day through Labor Day. For information, call 715/834-7871 or visit www.cvmuseum.com.

TOP

©2009 Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News