WECN Front Page
HOME
This month's Issue
CURRENT ISSUE
WECN RECIPES
RECIPES
WECN WISCONSIN EVENTS
EVENTS
WECN Archives
ARCHIVES
WECN HISTORY
HISTORY
WECN SEARCH ENGINE
SEARCH
Contact Us
CONTACT US
July 2009 Issue
July 09
Feature 1
STILL NIFTY
AT FIFTY
Feature 2

RENEWING
INNOVATION

Editorial
EDITORIAL
Wisconsin Favorites
Wisconsin Favorites
FAIREST OF THE FAIRS
ARCHIVES

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

 

 

 

 

Still Nifty at Fifty

Co-op Insurance Plan a Life-saver

Wisconsin’s electric cooperatives have been responsible for a number of notable “firsts” over the seven decades of their existence. Among them are the nation’s first statewide electric co-op association, in 1936; the nation’s first statewide newspaper for electric cooperative members, in 1940 (you’re reading its present-day incarnation); and the nation’s first self-insurance organization for electric co-ops.

All three of those and several other Wisconsin cooperative firsts have managed to stick around long-term, but from the perspective of individual co-op members it would be hard to overrate the value of the Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange, for a couple of reasons: It helps keep people safe, and it saves them money.

The organization usually referred to by co-op personnel simply as “Federated” this month marks half a century of service, having received its license to do business from Wisconsin Insurance Commissioner Charles Manson in July 1959. No comparable entity—an insurance company made up entirely of electric cooperatives—had ever existed before.

The Why and the How

There’s nothing mysterious about why electric cooperatives decided they had to have their own insurance company. In fact the circumstances that prompted Federated’s creation are strikingly similar to the ones that convinced rural Americans to establish their own electric co-ops during the 1930s. Back then, there was no shortage of power providers, but they were decidedly uninterested in extending their lines to lightly populated rural areas. In the mid-1950s, there was no shortage of insurance providers, but they were decidedly uninterested in providing coverage at a cost co-ops could afford. The Wisconsin co-ops took it upon themselves to do something about that.

“In the mid-1950s, commercial insurance carriers thought cooperatives were not a good risk,” CEO Phil Irwin explained to participants in Federated’s 2009 annual meeting this past February. “Insurance rates for electric cooperatives during this time were 50 to 100 percent higher than those for investor-owned [utility] companies. In some instances, cooperatives were not able to secure insurance coverage, a requirement the [federal Rural Electrification Administration] imposed before they would release loan funds.”

The source of this difficulty in obtaining necessary worker’s compensation coverage was a fundamentally flawed assumption that cooperatives didn’t measure up to the safety standards of other utilities. Just the opposite proved to be true, Irwin said.

“Armed with an independent study that showed cooperatives’ losses actually were below industry average for utility companies,” he said, “Federated’s founders began the lengthy process of establishing an organization to insure cooperatives.”

Lengthy indeed. It started with the Job Training and Safety Committee of the Wisconsin Electric Cooperative (as the statewide association was called at that time) beginning to investigate a self-insurance program and recommending the concept, in the spring of 1956, to the electric co-op managers association. Within a few months a study directed by the University of Wisconsin School of Commerce concluded a self-insurance plan would be both feasible and a money-saver. Before year’s end, the statewide association’s board approved articles of incorporation for Federated Rural Electric Insurance.

Planning and appeals for individual co-op support continued through most of 1957, but momentum slowed that fall. The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA) had become interested in taking ownership and running the proposed self-insurance operation, leading to several months of planning along those lines. But in February 1958, the NRECA board of directors demurred. The project’s fate was once again up to its Wisconsin originators.

Back in their hands, the enterprise gathered speed. The organizational meeting of Federated Rural Electric Insurance was held in Madison in March 1958. Fifteen co-ops subscribed to the capital stock. Later that month, Statewide Manager Bill Thomas predicted that in a few years, “We will regard the formation of Federated Rural Electric Insurance Company as one of our greatest assets in the service to our member cooperatives.”

Thomas hoped policies could be written by the beginning of 1959, but it took a bit longer to obtain adequate capital and a reinsurance agreement, get a state license, and secure membership in the insurance rating bureau. Complicating matters, some member co-ops’ workers’ compensation policies had expired and had to be renewed with the old carriers.

But on July 20, 1959, Federated received its license to do business in Wisconsin, the first insurance license in U.S. history issued to an organization of electric cooperatives. That very same day, Federated issued its first policy to Adams-Marquette Rural Electric Cooperative in Friendship, Wisconsin.

Steady and Strong

In 1959 Federated was providing insurance in one state for 16 cooperatives. By the end of 2008 the numbers had grown to 40 states and 765 cooperatives. Premiums, totaling $31,000 in 1959, reached $138.6 million last year. The assets of $270,000 in 1959 grew to $324 million by December 31, 2008.  “I can assure you that the first $25 million was much harder to come by than the last $25 million,” Phil Irwin told the February annual meeting attendees.

But what does that mean for individual co-op members? In very direct and utilitarian terms, it means money kept within the cooperative system instead of being paid to outside providers. That means money reinvested to strengthen and improve the cooperative organizations. In more personal terms, it means a strengthened effort to prevent property losses and human tragedies.

Through the first 25 years of Federated’s operations, the company returned $2.9 million to member co-ops to support job training and safety programs. That number has since climbed to more than $31 million.

The money is used by local co-ops to advance a concept Federated refers to as the “Culture of Safety,” something the organization preaches with conviction and on a daily basis.

The economic reasoning behind this is summed up in the company’s 2005 annual report that says, “Almost anything an electric utility owns, leases or does creates risk and potential for loss.”

Frank Fraas, who retired as Federated CEO in 2006, says the organization confronts this harsh reality by “preaching and preaching and preaching about maintaining your system, training your employees, insisting on safety; it’s just the right thing to do.”

It’s the right thing to do not just for the economic interests of the co-op and its insurance carrier, or the well-being of line crews and other employees, but also for the safety of families and businesses served by the co-op and the quality of service provided. As Phil Irwin explained in February, “There’s no way you can prevent an active youngster from climbing a tree, but you can trim or cut these trees so you won’t have the [tragedy] of some child grabbing or hitting a hot line.”

And looking again at the practical side, Irwin added that besides preventing tragedy, rigorous attention to safe practices—exemplified by maintaining a clear right-of-way—can bring positive results “from less storm damage, less overtime for outages, and less line loss,” all of which otherwise mean greater expense for the co-op and its members.

Federated’s doctrine is that everyone in a co-op organization—the directors, the management team, and every employee—must cultivate habits “so people don’t need to think about safety, they just react; they do safety things just like they put on their shoes in the morning. They don’t think about it, it’s just natural that they do that,” Fraas says.

He adds that the company’s experience has shown that people have “caught on that we really do control our own destiny” where safe practices—and the consequences of neglecting them—are concerned.

History Repeats

It’s not hard to see the parallel between creation of electric cooperatives because others thought it unprofitable to serve, and creation of an electric co-op insurance company because others thought it too risky to serve. Both ideas proved misguided.

More opportunities to compare the thinking of cooperatives and bigger rivals turn up in the financial chaos of recent years. Insurance companies far larger than Federated have suffered catastrophic losses both financially and in terms of public confidence.

And Federated has by no means been immune. As Phil Irwin noted in his annual meeting address, “Basically there was nowhere to hide in 2008 from an investment perspective.” In the sour investment market, the company realized $2.9 million in capital losses last year.

But while Irwin told his audience that 2008 “proved to be an incredibly tough financial environment for insurance companies,” he could add something that sets Federated apart: “I can tell you that unlike other property and casualty companies that I know, we did not have to ask the federal government for $150 billion dollars last year.”
Ask anyone who’s been there to see electric cooperatives and their insurance carrier hold on and stay healthy while bigger players with more exotic business concepts have crashed and burned, and they’ll probably say it works that way because a co-op sticking to its principles always makes sure it’s all about the members.

Wrapping up his annual meeting address, Irwin looked to a brighter future and told the crowd, “I hope over the next 50 years Federated will always retain its focus remembering the members we serve.”—Dave Hoopman

TOP

 

 

 

Renewing Rennovation

Electric Co-ops Lead Renewable Resource Development

 

Solar panels and wind turbines currently capture the public’s imagination when it comes to meeting future electricity needs. However, perception of these technologies does not come close to matching their actual contribution to our nation’s energy mix—now or in the years to come.

When asked by Bisconti Research, Inc. where most electricity will come from in 15 years, 72 percent of Americans believe solar will reign as the top source, followed by wind. But projections from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) paint a very different picture. Under the most likely scenario, wind will generate just 2.4 percent of our country’s energy by 2030, solar a fractional 0.2 percent.

That means we will need coal, natural gas, and nuclear power to continue “keeping the lights on.” But renewable sources will grow in size, and they could take a big leap forward if Congress, as expected, follows the lead of 28 states and the District of Columbia and sets “green power” mandates for electric utilities. These would require utilities to add specific amounts of renewable energy generation to their systems within a given timeframe. Since renewable energy technology is more expensive than other sources of generation, such government mandates will directly increase consumers’ electric bills.

When it comes to generating electricity from renewable sources, like hydro, wind, biomass, geothermal, solar, and hydrokinetic (tidal and ocean wave), electric cooperatives are leading the way while keeping power affordable for members. In fact, co-ops today receive 11 percent of their power requirements from renewables compared to 9 percent for electric utilities as a whole—and since 2000 electric cooperative residential rates have consistently remained lower than the industry average.  

Biomass Appeal

With resources close by and more room to expand, many renewable projects are built in rural areas. For example, Dairyland Power Cooperative of La Crosse has helped harness biomass power by using biological material to produce electricity. Cow and swine manure and landfill waste are creating methane that’s currently burned in electric generators at eight locations throughout the co-op’s service territory, and more projects are in development. The landfill generation totals 14.4 megawatts; the various manure digesters account for about 3 megawatts. In addition, a year from now Dairyland plans to purchase the 40-megawatt output of a power plant at Cassville that’s set to burn wood waste, another biomass source.

According to EIA, 11 percent of all renewable energy produced in the U.S. last year came from biomass; within 22 years, that figure will grow to 32 percent, second only to hydropower.

But the electricity these rural biomass facilities produce must be delivered to cities quite a distane away. Current transmission lines can’t meet this need, so more lines must be built to connect new renewable generation to members. Generation and transmission cooperatives like Dairyland are uniquely qualified to meet this need, with a strong transmission grid already in place and cooperative partners stationed close to rural renewable resources.

Setting Standards

So far, 28 states and the District of Columbia have enacted renewable portfolio standards (RPS), laws that require investor-owned utilities, competitive retail electric generation suppliers, as well as some municipal electric systems and electric cooperatives to add increasing amounts of “clean and green” electricity to their power supply mix (ranging from 10 percent to 30 percent) by a certain date (mostly between 2018 and 2025). Five other states (North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia) have passed non-binding renewable goals.

Now, Congress may get into act and adopt national renewable electricity and energy efficiency standards for utilities that will likely augment state RPS statutes.

Of course, ordering standards is one thing; meeting them is another. Some states have stronger and more reliable wind resources available, while others benefit from more sunshine. To take better advantage of renewable energy opportunities no matter where they may be located, electric cooperatives last year formed the National Renewables Cooperative Organization (NRCO). The new co-op will help its members share renewable power expertise and collaborate on projects across the nation.

“NRCO allows members to incorporate cost effective and economically viable renewable resources into their power supply mix,” notes NRCO CEO Amadou Fall. Twenty-four cooperatives—including Wisconsin’s Dairyland Power and Adams–Columbia Electric co-ops—have joined the new initiative; an overview of the program can be found at www.renewable.coop.

Engaged, Out Front

NRCO marks the continuing evolution of the cooperative model to meet changing conditions, remarks Ron Harper, general manager & CEO of Basin Electric Power and president of the NRCO Board of Directors. “Because of the possibility of a national renewable electricity standard, and because of the interest of cooperative members in renewable energy, there’s no question that power supply cooperatives across the country will continue to expand the amount of renewable energy in their portfolios. This is why owner-members of NRCO consider it such a crucial initiative.”

Whether through national projects or generation in their own backyard, cooperatives are blazing the trail for others in making renewable power a reality. To learn more, visit www.nreca.coop.—Megan McKoy, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association

Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Bisconti Research Inc., NRECA, American Wind Energy Association

TOP

 

 

 

EDITORIAL
by Perry Baird

Capitalizing on public fear may be a quick way to make a profit, but the public needs to be wary of what’s being sold.

Already secure in its position as an ultimate example of business greed and exploitation, bankrupt energy marketer Enron continues to be a magnet for dubious fame. A recent series of stories appearing in Canada’s National Post, titled “Climate Profiteers,” fingers the now-disgraced corporation as a key influence on the momentum for a national program to cap and trade carbon emissions—a plan presently being pushed by the White House and debated in Congress.

The Post recounts Enron efforts beginning in the early 1990s as it bought influence with politicians and environmental organizations to advance a market where permits to emit carbon dioxide could be traded. The motive, of course, was a mountain of money—potentially many times more than the fortune Enron had amassed from an earlier cap-and-trade program for sulfur dioxide. What Enron was relying on in order to cash in, according to the Post, was public fear of “a looming global catastrophe if carbon dioxide emissions weren’t curbed.”

Though Enron is now out of the game, others in the energy industry and on Wall Street are positioning themselves to pick up—and profit—where Enron left off.

Local Overtures

 On a smaller scale but similarly preying on public concerns, opportunists see the present energy climate, with its escalating fuel and electricity prices, as ripe for making some quick profits. A story in our March edition (“Too Good to Be True”) cited examples of businesses aggressively hawking devices for the home that they claimed could save astounding, near-miraculous amounts of electricity. Some of the devices proved to be not only downright dangerous to use, but their installation invited legal prosecution for meter tampering and theft.

Within the past couple of months I received a postcard inviting my wife and me to dinner at a local restaurant to learn about how we could save 45 percent on our utility bill. Scant information about the sender or the product existed on the postcard; it just had a toll-free RSVP number and a Mississippi post office return address. I soon discovered many others were also getting such mailings.

Value in Vigilance

We ultimately learned the source was a company selling “radiant barriers,” a home-insulating material made with aluminum foils to reflect radiant heat. Enough public curiosity about these energy-saving claims prompted Wisconsin’s Focus on Energy to post a response on its web site: http://www.askfocusonenergy.com/Answers/289. Bottom line: Radiant barriers work better in hot climates than in cool (like Wisconsin), and it’s usually more cost effective here to install more than the suggested minimum amount of conventional insulation.

While maybe some of these opportunistic companies don’t actually vend illegal, unsafe, or totally useless energy products—or engage in Enron’s brand of market-manipulation swindling—in this period of public frustration with rising costs, their energy-saving claims need close scrutiny.

Our advice: Call your electric co-op if you have questions!

.

TOP

 

 

 

For summer entertainment that simply screams “Wisconsin,” you just can’t do any better than to check out your local fair. Whether it’s a junior fair, a mid-sized county fair, or the Wisconsin State Fair, you’re in for a great time. Most fairs feature kids’ animals and other exhibits, such as farm produce, sewing, baking, and crafts. Many also hold competitions for local adults’ work. And you’ll nearly always find festive food booths (from hot dogs to funnel cakes, corn to lemonade), entertainment, and carnival rides. You can support your local youngsters while having yourself a good, old-fashioned time at the fair.

Although at least one fair has already been held—the Elroy Fair in late June—you’re still in good shape for most of the festivities. Most are scheduled from now through Labor Day weekend, with a few fairs slated even later in September.

Of course you’ll want to attend your local fair, where you’ll see all your friends and neighbors. But why stop there? Perhaps you’ll want to sample another nearby county’s event, or spread your wings at a larger fair. Depending on what you enjoy, you can find equine events; car races, tractor pulls, or demolition events; the best variety of food (from carnival fare to home cooking); and high-quality musical entertainment. If you have Internet access, you can narrow down the choices by Googling the counties, cities, or the name of the events you’re interested in.

For example, take in a mid-sized county fair in Jefferson on July 8–12. The Jefferson County Fair offers a Badger truck pull and tractor pull, freestyle motorcycle riding, a demolition derby, and entertainment by The Dweebs, Travis Tritt, and Kenny Wayne Shepherd. The Rock County Fair in Janesville, July 28–August 2, always manages to lock in an oldie-but-goodie singing group or two (enjoy Larry Gatlin and the Gatlin Brothers on July 30, for instance).

End your summer with a bang by taking the family to a Labor Day weekend fair. The Central Wisconsin State Fair in Marshfield always features several days of draft horse competitions. And Wisconsin’s biggest county fair, the Walworth County Fair in Elkhorn, offers free grandstand entertainment such as Styx, along with a mind-boggling array of food prepared by local churches and groups, as well as commercial vendors.

Of course, the crème de la crème is the Wisconsin State Fair in West Allis. That’s where they hand out the coveted ribbons for the state’s best, along with 11 days of premiere entertainment, ranging from Foreigner (August 7) and Davy Jones (August 13) to gladiator cage fighting (August 15). And talk about the food.…

Whatever you choose, make this a “fair” season!—Linda Hilton

 

TOP

 

©2009 Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News